Tuesday, May 31, 2011

A few emails from our lovely contributor, Carrie

Dear Scott Walker,I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. Today is Memorial Day, and I hope everyone had an opportunity to thank military servicemen, servicewomen, and their families for the sacrifices they endure. I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.

Carrie
 
 Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. I know that technically I did not email you last night. I was visiting my family, so I did not send an email. I did, however, write an email and saved it to send today. You can let me know if you feel like we should start our count over again or not. Here is my letter written on 5/28/11 and emailed on 5/29/11:

Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. How was your Saturday? I got to spend mine with my husband, mom, step-dad, sister, twin nieces, nephew, and 6 dogs. Does that sound busy? It was! We were up pretty early and spent a couple of hours getting cereal and talking. Then we got to work. We dug up and transplanted some yucca plants, put a canopy on a gazebo, planted flower seeds, moved dirt from a pile and spread it down to plant grass seed, planted grass seed, and watered plants. We got a lot done, and we could not have done it without each other. We cooperated and used teamwork. Have you had a chance to cooperate and use teamwork lately? It is amazing when people cooperate and use teamwork because you can get more done in less time. Plus, everyone contributes, which creates a feeling of mutual dependence and importance. People work within their areas of strength and also learn about the strengths of others. Throughout these experiences, people have the opportunities to learn new strengths and information, as well. I know from personal and professional experience that when we all genuinely want each other to succeed, we make sure that we all succeed because we are on the same team working together. When we are more concerned with what is "in it for us" and "who is going to get the credit" we do not always put forth our best effort. Sometimes we can harbor feelings of resentment or negativity when we feel someone else is going to get credit for all of our work. Remember there is no "I" in team. Today we all worked had in different ways at different times, and in the end everything turned out great! Additionally, we got the work done so quickly that we were able to go for four-wheeler rides, play soccer, and throw balls and frisbees for the dogs. 

You may think, "Great, you were working with your family doing "fun" things, so of course you all had a great time and completed the work with smiles on your faces." I assure you that I would not have chosen to do any of those activities today. Getting bit up by mosquitoes and black flies while smelling your own armpits is not my idea of fun. Working together, contributing, talking, interacting, completing a project, and accomplishing a task with others is what makes it fun. The task and the people will always change, the "fun" will not. Fun is what you make it!

I had a phenomenal Saturday, and I hope you did too. I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.

Since this is sort-of a letter within a letter, so I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. 

Carrie
 
Dear Scott Walker,I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. I do not have time to write a detailed email today. I just wanted to make sure that you know and it gets recorded that I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.

Carrie
 
 

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Don't forget that I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.

Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. I am feeling creative tonight and want to write another poem to communicate my feelings. I wrote a poem in my email for 4/18/11. That was one of the emails I pre-emailed you with the "open on" subject line. It had words that rhymed with OPPOSE because I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. I have chosen a different format for this poem; I hope you are still able to understand my message:

I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more

Openly and
Purposefully I craft original emails nightly
Partly for me and mostly for you
Only to find
Some machine is yet again speaking on your behalf
Everyone has a voice, and I want to hear yours

Sound bites simply are not
Enough for me anymore
Now we have reached
A
Time in our relationship that I must say to you:
Enough is enough!

Big, little, young, old, no one 
Is spared from your
Litigation bills (Do the taxpayers know you are costing them money when you violate the law?)
Lawyers, lawsuits, law, low-down dirty shame!

2 people emailing nightly, one pouring her heart out, the other searching for something...a heart?
2 immediate replies received, one a message about mail delivery failure

And the other, a generic letter desiring to usurp power from a hard-working, tax-paying citizen
No you are not going to pretend to be representing me
Do not write that you are my governor

Shirley is my grandma, and she is my governor. I voted for Grandma Shirley and
Others are writing her in on the ballot, too.

Making cuts and calling votes
Under the cover of darkness
Children's education: cut!
Healthcare services: cut!

Mother and baby benefits: cut!
Oh, and don't forget about public transportation: cut!
Recycling: cut! Really? How is what you are doing benefiting the citizens of Wisconsin?
Everyone needs to look in the mirror at some point. 

I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.


Dear Scott Walker,I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. How has you Sunday been so far? Mine has been amazing! I did not get out of bed until 9 am! Then I did dishes, cleaned the kitchen, and prepped our meals for the rest of the week. This is goinga to be a busy week for us. How about you? The weather was so nice that I sat outside this afternoon to grade papers. Tonight will bring some beef Kung Pao for dinner and working on report cards. What are you going to be doing tonight? I hope you were able to fit in a little Sunday funday, even if it is just grading papers in your backyard on a sunny afternoon. Wait, you wouldn't be grading papers. Even if it is just creating an authentic reply to emails in your backyard (paid for by taxpayers) on a sunny afternoon. Enjoy your Sunday funday :) I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.

Carrie 
 
Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. I am starting to feel like I am the only one working at this relationship. I ask questions, share experiences, and seek mutual understanding, but you just keep replying the same thing over and over:
Thank you for your e-mail message.  I welcome you expressing your views and concerns to me, and I commend you for participating in your state government.  I take into account the views of all of the citizens of Wisconsin, and I will keep your specific comments in mind during my service as your Governor.

If you would like more information about my positions on issues, or would like to read my public statements on issues, I encourage you to explore my website: www.walker.wi.gov.  I like to respond individually to every letter and telephone call I receive; however, I cannot respond to each e-mail individually due to the volume.  If your request is time sensitive, please call my office at (608) 266-1212. You may also write to me via conventional mail at Governor Scott Walker: PO Box 7863, Madison, WI 53707.

As noted on our website, please know that any communications may be subject to release under Wisconsin's public records law and that our policy is generally to release communications sent to this email address.

Once again, thank you for contacting me. Please feel free to contact me again if I can ever be of assistance to you.

Sincerely,

Scott Walker
Governor
I think you may becoming a little complacent in this relationship. I want you to know that I am not. This is important. I will not just fade away. I will email daily, unless I happen to miss a day, and then I will begin emailing daily again the following day. That reminds me, since a did miss emailing you last Sunday, are we starting fresh with the anniversary date, keeping the old one, or acknowledging both of them? I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.

Sincerely,
Carrie
What Teachers Make, or
Objection Overruled, or
If things don't work out, you can always go to law school

By Taylor Mali
He says the problem with teachers is, "What's a kid going to learn 
from someone who decided his best option in life was to become a teacher?" 
He reminds the other dinner guests that it's true what they say about 
teachers: 
Those who can, do; those who can't, teach.
I decide to bite my tongue instead of his 
and resist the temptation to remind the other dinner guests 
that it's also true what they say about lawyers.
Because we're eating, after all, and this is polite company.
"I mean, you¹re a teacher, Taylor," he says. 
"Be honest. What do you make?"
And I wish he hadn't done that 
(asked me to be honest) 
because, you see, I have a policy 
about honesty and ass-kicking: 
if you ask for it, I have to let you have it.
You want to know what I make?
I make kids work harder than they ever thought they could. 
I can make a C+ feel like a Congressional medal of honor 
and an A- feel like a slap in the face. 
How dare you waste my time with anything less than your very best.
I make kids sit through 40 minutes of study hall 
in absolute silence. No, you may not work in groups. 
No, you may not ask a question. 
Why won't I let you get a drink of water? 
Because you're not thirsty, you're bored, that's why.
I make parents tremble in fear when I call home: 
I hope I haven't called at a bad time, 
I just wanted to talk to you about something Billy said today. 
Billy said, "Leave the kid alone. I still cry sometimes, don't you?" 
And it was the noblest act of courage I have ever seen.
I make parents see their children for who they are 
and what they can be.
You want to know what I make?
I make kids wonder, 
I make them question. 
I make them criticize. 
I make them apologize and mean it. 
I make them write, write, write. 
And then I make them read. 
I make them spell definitely beautiful, definitely beautiful, definitely 
beautiful 
over and over and over again until they will never misspell 
either one of those words again. 
I make them show all their work in math. 
And hide it on their final drafts in English. 
I make them understand that if you got this (brains) 
then you follow this (heart) and if someone ever tries to judge you 
by what you make, you give them this (the finger).
Let me break it down for you, so you know what I say is true: 
I make a goddamn difference! What about you?

Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. Okay, let's address the white elephant. Wait, that is a white elephant gift! If you are unfamiliar, a white elephant gift is a gift that costs more to keep than give away. ***Rhetorical question coming*** Are you a white elephant gift? I kid, I kid! I kid because I know the answer; that is also why I warned you about a rhetorical question coming. Getting back to the topic at hand, what is it called when something seems unstoppable? What is something called when it will do what ever it has to do to get what it wants? Ahh, it is all coming back to me now; it is called the 800 pound gorilla in the room! Some people confuse this with the elephant in the room; they are different. What you and I want to address is the 800 pound gorilla in the room. Before we do that, I am looking for a punch-line: What do you get when you cross a white elephant with an 800 pound gorilla in the room? I know what I would say, but I am going to save that for my signature line. 

Let's get to the meat and potatoes of this email. Assembly Bill 7, also known as the Wisconsin Voter Suppression Bill, passes the Assembly today on 5/19/11. Here is a clip of what happened today in case you did not see it. 
Mike Ellis says things such as "shut up" and "no, nuh, nuhuh, no, nuhuh" and is very demanding and intimidating. The clerk calling the roll seems quite uneasy and his initial questioning about whether or not to continue the call is quickly squashed with "continue the roll-call" (repeatedly). After his second questioning, Mike Ellis demands to have the count. I present exhibit "800 pound gorilla in the room".  

Here is another clip of Mike Ellis swearing on the senate floor:
This clip is to reinforce Mike Ellis' lack of self-control and myopic agenda. I represent (as in present again) exhibit "800 pound gorilla in the room". 

I have heard that this bill will be in front of you to sign into law as early as next Wednesday (5/25/11). I would like to pose a question to you. Have you thought about whether or not you will sign Assembly Bill 7? Have you thought about the impact of signing this bill? Have you thought about what the financial ramifications to the state and taxpayers will be if you sign this bill into law? Have you thought about the statistics regarding voter fraud in the state of Wisconsin? Have you thought about the fact that there is insufficient voter fraud in the state of Wisconsin to make a statistical difference? Have you thought about the amount of disenfranchisement you will be inflicting on hard-working citizens of Wisconsin? Gosh darn it, I intend to pose one question to you so I am more likely to elicit a response from you; then that morphs into multiple questions. It reminds me of posters I saw in Madison "Screw us and we multiply". One question leads into the next, which gets me thinking about another, then I wonder what you would say about...you get the picture, right? I mean correct! I have really been trying to break my habit of using certain words. For example, why say tool when you can just as easily say "handheld device that aids in accomplishing a task"? If you have done nothing else for me, you have created an aversion to certain words. Let's refocus to the many questions I posed to you about Assembly Bill 7. Luckily for you, all of my questions can be answered with "yes" or "no". I purposefully did not require more explanation than that. I want you to have time to personally reflect on your reasoning. You have nothing to justify to me. I voted my conscience; I voted for Grandma Shirley. You are the one you have to go to bed with at night. You are the one you have to look at in the mirror in the morning. You are the one you need to face throughout the day. I mean, really, if you cannot convince yourself, how can you be expected to convince the people who bought the election for you? Grrr, did I go there or was it just in my head? I am pretty sure I went there. Bought, brought, tomato, tomaaahto. What does it really matter? You will still send me an automated response that does not come close to addressing any issue we need to discuss, right? :) Great, at least you are consistent. 

Don't forget to think of a punch-line for "What do you get when you cross a white elephant with an 800 pound gorilla in the room?" Don't forget to look at my signature line for my punch-lines.  Don't forget that I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.

Sincerely,
Carrie
Punch-line to "What do you get when you cross a white elephant with an 800 pound gorilla in the room?"
Someone who thinks he is CEO of Wisconsin OR someone who thinks he is creating more jobs than he is destroying in Wisconsin OR someone who packs his lunch (or perhaps has his wife pack it) and thinks that is extraordinary OR someone who has no problem disenfranchising citizens of Wisconsin (Please do not be fooled my use of the singular form here. You have some how managed to insulate yourself with white elephant 800 pound gorillas in a room. We are working on that, though.)

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Office of Sec. of State, Domesitc Partnership, Voter ID...the list keeps going and going

May 17, 2011                                                                

Dear Scott,

There is no justification or reason for changing the office of Secretary of State. I ask you to leave it alone and unchanged and kill the bill that seeks to do so.

Please confirm that you will do so.

May 17, 2011

Dear Scott,

I just read that you do not want to defend the state's domestic partnership law against a legal challenge and have filed court papers to withdraw from the case.

SHAME!

There is no justification or reason for doing so. Why would you deny your constituents the basic human decency of having the right to visit a loved one in a hospital or receive family medical leave? How un-Christian of you; you are a hypocrite!

I ask you to resume defending the state's domestic partnership law against all legal challenges.

Please confirm that you will do so.

May 17, 2011

Dear Rep. Wynn,

You supported Assembly Bill 7 (the Voter ID bill also called the Voter Suppression Act).

I am really curious why you think voter fraud is problematic at all, let alone increasing, because my understanding is that the voter fraud has NOT been documented as a problem here or elsewhere. (For example, a recent study in Ohio showed that the voter fraud rate for that state was only .00004 percent.)

Please explain the factual basis for your statement that “Voter fraud in past elections has become increasingly problematic” (and please include the number of successful criminal prosecutions for voter fraud in the state of Wisconsin for each of the past 10 years and as the percentage of total votes cast state wide in that year).

Also please explain why, if Wisconsin is broke, you can justify spending (according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau) more than $5.7 million of our tax dollars to implement the bill.

You sent me a letter that alleged that two investigations in Milwaukee revealed thousands of cases of voter fraud but omitted any identifying information which would verify the allegations, which therefore completely lack in credibility. (Of course if the stories were true - they would have received national news coverage - but didn't.)  And of course you did not identify a single case of successful prosecution.

And I love that you mention the generic unsubstantiated stories by unidentified voters. How about you make decisions based on verified facts instead of rumors?

In addition to the information requested above, please tell me the names and the contact info of the persons who conducted the investigations in Milwaukee which you described in your letter and also please forward me a copy of the investigation reports which I'm sure you would have personally reviewed if you were going to rely on them.

Thank you and I look forward to your prompt response.


May 17, 2011

Dear Rep. Wynn,

I don't appreciate being lied to.

I know that the Voter Suppression Act does NOT have the provisions you mentioned. For example: The ID cards are NOT offered free of charge - one has to ASK for them to be free. How many people will know that? And DMV offices across the state are only in limited locations and open for limited hours. How many people lack transportation? Or can afford to take time off work to go there?

You rejected EVERY every single amendment that would have helped prevent the bill from disenfranchising thousands of Wisconsin voters:

* amendment to require administration to find a way to pay for voter ID bill without raiding transportation fund; amendment fails.
* amendment to require DMVs to have evening and Saturdays in every county. Now that we are requiring people to have a DMV issued ID to vote, we should make sure people have access to DMV offices. Many counties have no DMV office or are only open once a month; amendment fails.
* amendment to allow voters to vote without photo ID if they object to photos of themselves being taken for religious reasons; amendment fails.
* amendment to require mobile DMV stations on college campuses if we aren't going to have offices in every county open at night or on weekends
* amendment to have mobile DMV stations in high poverty areas; amendment fails.
* amendment to clarify what it means to have the name on your ID "conform" to the name on the voter rolls; i.e. John F Smith in the ID versus John Smith on the voter rolls; amendment fails
* amendment to make it clear on the DMV form that they can get the ID free of charge; amendment fails.
* amendment that moves the deadline to clarify the provisional ballot to 10 days after the election; amendment fails.
* amendment to address absurdity in the law: you need photo ID to get a birth certificate AND you need a birth certificate to get a photo ID; amendment fails
* amendment to ensure that the homeless and those in transient housing can still vote without proof of residency; amendment fails. Stone, author of the bill says homeless people will now have 'responsibilities' to exercise their right to vote. He also concedes he doesn't know if DOT will give an ID with the address of a public library, as the homeless currently do. Wow.
* amendment to inform the voter if their vote has been deemed provisional. How else are voters to know if they have to correct their ballot; amendment fails
* amendment to exempt towns from this bill; amendment fails. So much for local control.
* amendment to remove requirement that voters mail in a copy of their photo ID when they vote by mail;amendment fails.
* amendment to waive fees for secondary ID's to get DMV voter card to avoid poll tax; amendment fails.
* amendment that out of state license is acceptable form of ID if corroborating ID of current WI address; amendment fails.
* amendment to clarify that if license is suspended revoked it is still valid for the purposes of voting; amendment fails.
* amendment that says employers have to give 3 hours off of work to get to one of these rarely open DMV centers; amendment fails.
* amendment to require clerks to keep voter lists up to date so that you right to vote is based on you proving your qualification as a voter NOT on the potential mistakes in a voter list; amendment fails.
* amendment to keep expired ID's valid back to the last NOVEMBER general election; amendment fails.
* amendment to allow for Student ID's to be valid ID's for the purposes of voting; amendment fails.
* amendment to restore straight ticket voting; amendment fails.
* amendment to all people with disabilities to be required from having to sign the voter roll if a disability prevents them from doing so; amendment fails.
* amendment to give people with disabilities the opportunity to vote with other forms of government issued ID's; amendment fails.
* amendment to make it illegal to bribe someone with anything of value in exchange for signing a recall petition. Kensoha bartender was caught on tape trading shots for signatures. Amendment fails.
* amendment to allow voters to stay on absentee list if they miss one election; amendment fails.
* amendment to require county clerks to post results online community by community and ward by ward on election day. This would avoid clerks magically finding more than 14,000 votes two days after the election in a way that changes the outcome of a statewide election. Amendment fails.
* amendment to allow any ID issued by any level of government to be valid for the purposes of voting. It will save the state at least $7 million on the cost of the bill; amendment fails.
* amendments to allow affidavit to be signed verifying someone's identity if they don't have proper documentation on Election Day; they all fail

You are NOT representing the people of your district - you are merely rubber stamping the corporate agenda advanced by Scott Walker.

Shame on you! We will not forget.

When all the trees have been cut down, when all the animals have been hunted, when all the waters are polluted, when all the air is unsafe to breathe, only then will you discover you cannot eat money.

Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. I want to address a bill that will be in front of you. I am uncertain of the number and even if you are aware of it, and the radio announcement that I heard made it seem as if you may or may not pass the bill, so you might not know what is coming your way. I just heard a very brief segment about the bill to stop disinfectant additions to Wisconsin drinking water, so I want you to clarify your position and how you think it will benefit Wisconsin as a whole. I say benefit Wisconsin as a whole because, well, just read my signature line. Ahh, I am a softie and pasted it here for you: When all the trees have been cut down, when all the animals have been hunted, when all the waters are polluted, when all the air is unsafe to breathe, only then will you discover you cannot eat money. ~ Cree Prophecy Do not confuse me with an Angel Softie, though. We all know that Georgia Pacific products are not benefiting angels or softies! I am fairly certain you know that Georgia Pacific products are benefiting the Kock brothers. Remember, you thought you were taking a call from one of them a couple of months ago. I have called you, but the voice mail is always full. Anyhooo! Getting back to the quotation: When all the trees have been cut down, when all the animals have been hunted, when all the waters are polluted, when all the air is unsafe to breathe, only then will you discover you cannot eat money. ~ Cree Prophecy It may not be you or your kids, but if we keep this up, it will definitely be your kids' kids that will not be able to eat money. So, do you support the proposal to stop disinfectant additions to Wisconsin drinking water? If so, how does this benefit your stance on hydraulic fracturing, or hydrofracking as the kids are calling it now-a-days, in Wisconsin? From what I understand, you are a proponent of the hydraulic fracturing procedure. Have you seen news footage about the ramifications for people living in the areas where hydraulic fracturing procedures are taking place? Have you seen how people can light their tap water on fire? Have you heard of Halliburton? I assure you, these are reputable news sources reporting about hard-working citizens. I have seen these segments on news sources such as 60 Minutes (http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7054210n) and local news stations. I will pose the question again in case you got side tracked by the video: Do you support the bill to stop disinfectant additions to Wisconsin drinking water? If yes, how does the bill to stop disinfectant additions to Wisconsin drinking water benefit Wisconsin? If yes, how does the bill to stop disinfectant additions to Wisconsin drinking water benefit hydraulic fracturing in Wisconsin? If yes, how does the bill to stop disinfectant additions to Wisconsin drinking water benefit Halliburton hydraulic fracturing in Wisconsin? If yes, how does the bill to stop disinfectant additions to Wisconsin drinking water benefit living, breathing citizens of Wisconsin? I just want to know the benefits. Oh, by the way, I already know that I cannot eat money, so I am unwilling to allow you to cut down all my trees, hunts all my animals, pollute my waters, and contaminate my air. Oh, by the way, I am not alone. We OPPOSE the bill to stop disinfectant additions to Wisconsin drinking water. We OPPOSE hydraulic fracturing in Wisconsin. We OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. 

Carrie

Have you ever had the kind of day where your head is spinning?

Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. Have you ever had the kind of day where your head is spinning? Have you ever had that kind of week? Have you ever looked at the calendar and realized that it is only Wednesday?!? This is the sort of week I am having. I know that you have visited select schools (mostly charter and under quite secret pretenses); perhaps you feel that is enough to give you a "feel" for the state of education and perhaps even education itself. I assure you it is not. I am going to extend an invitation to you, yet again, to spend a day with me. I will let you pick the day because I am positive that any day you choose from now until 6/16/11 will either be busy, busier, or the busiest you have ever been (I will not guarantee that it will be the busiest I have ever been. I cannot make this guarantee because it is a very definitive term, and quite frankly, I do not have time to think about when I have been the busiest, let alone rate it against other days to determine if that is, in fact, the case.) Please look at your schedule and see what works best for you. I am willing to pick you up at the high-speed rail station, and we can carpool from there. Oooops! Is the Badger Bus still running the Madison/Milwaukee route? Wait, I think I heard something about an SUV perk to your job. I got an SUV with my job, well actually I guess it was for my job. You know transporting curriculum and supplies. I guess technically it was bought with taxpayer money, of which a portion is mine, after I performed a service. Wait, I may have even been a factor in producing more productive citizens and more future, if not current, taxpayers. Is this starting to make your head spin? Let's take it step by step. I do not "receive" anything; I earn it. I pay for everything I own. I pay for somethings other people own and consume. I pay for somethings people are using temporarily (ie: your car and housing). I am busy. I love what I do. I want you to come spend the day with me and learn why I cannot imagine doing anything else. I will provide you the opportunity to meet people you will not forget. I can offer insight into a resolution. Enough about me, let's talk about you. :) You will see me in "action". You will realize we have more in common, as people. You will laugh hard, cry hard, laugh until you cry hard, and maybe all of those in one day. If you stick it out for one week, you will almost certainly have the opportunity to do all of those. You will volunteer for recess and/or lunch duty. You will have the opportunity to play "explosion tag" if it is nice out. You will arrive home exhausted. You will reflect and fall asleep with a smile, after grading and/or lesson planning, of course. You will wake up thinking you are one of the luckiest people in the universe. Perhaps I am projecting a bit; that is how I feel, and I cannot wait to share that feeling with you. :) I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.


Carrie

You haven’t responded to my e-mail from February 22,2011


Dear Governor Walker,

I was initially going to write to you to ask some questions about your recent legislation— in particular, the voter identification law and your proposition to deny hospital visitation rights to same-sex couples, but it occurred to me that you haven’t responded to my e-mail from February 22,2011 addressing your intent to strip public workers of their collective bargaining rights.  This made me question whether or not my efforts to write you again would be futile. While waiting to hear from you, I’ve been following all sorts of news in anticipation of finding a logical rationale to your motive; but, as you are probably well aware, the media can be a less than reliable source of information.  This, governor, is why countless friends, colleagues, acquaintances and I have decided to go directly to you for answers.

I’ve been waiting 77 days for your response. While I’m only 26 years-old, and can only tally the number of jobs I’ve held on one hand, I have yet to encounter a job where it is permissible to allow this length of time to pass before addressing an inquiry from a client.  In fact, in my present job, I can be reprimanded for not returning a phone call, letter or e-mail within 24 business hours.  In the event I need more time to compose a thoughtful, informed response because a situation requires special tact, sensitivity, or resources I must acquire, I'm necessitated to acknowledge the writer  in a short personal message indicating that her message is important, and I will address all points as soon as I am able.  This, of course, eases the writer’s mind and communicates that her concern is legitimate.  Even if it seems superfluous to me, it is my duty to attempt to understand his point of view and address it, nonetheless.  My workplace has enforced this policy so as to hold its faculty to the highest professional regard.  After all, it's what I'm paid to do.

I imagine the demands as a governor are greater than I can possibly fathom.  Though as fathomed by an English teacher, maybe they aren't.  I imagine, like me, that your job extends well beyond the workday, and, like me, you often lie awake late into the night questioning whether the decisions you make every day in your job are, indeed, the best ones;  also, like me, I imagine you constantly search for ways to thoughtfully address the needs and concerns of the people you are paid (and elected) to serve. 

Since I am only one of your constituents with one letter, I’m not offended that you haven’t found the time to address my e-mail.  Maybe it became lost in the abyss of cyberspace; maybe, as you were contemplating my points, you spilled coffee on your keyboard which launched a much more urgent debacle, and you simply forgot about it.  Maybe a computer virus wiped it out.  Some of these are circumstances beyond your control.  I am, however, skeptical that this has also happened to the letters and e-mails of every single person I know who has written to you. 

Given the sheer volume of mail you must receive and the likelihood that it is simply humanly impossible to address each one in the personal manner that professionalism merits, I might suggest a simple televised address providing detailed answers and explanations to the most commonly asked questions.  Maybe this could be a regular occurrence (with a possibility of contributing to your goal of 250,000 jobs?).  I feel this might provide some degree of relief to those who are trying to reach you, but can’t, and also relieve your inbox and mailbox of redundant  materials.

  It could very well be that the task of properly addressing the abundant concerns of your constituents prevents you from adequately executing the many other demands of your job.  As is the case in every other profession of which I’m aware, if an individual is unable to sufficiently perform all tasks of his or her job, that individual is asked to resign.  If I feel I cannot perform all aspects of my job due to stress, anxiety, or a general sense of overwhelming, I have a personal duty to myself and a professional duty to my students and colleagues to allow a more capable individual to take my place.

Furthermore, if you are receiving such a high volume of negative mail that you simply cannot personally address each writer in a prompt, passable way, it is a clear reflection of your competency and professionalism.  That said, please use the content of your mailboxes, either electronic or otherwise, as a gauge of your performance and take the necessary steps to alleviate anxiety and stress on yourself as well as the citizens you've neglected.

Before I bring my most recent points of distress to your attention, I'm attaching a second copy of my February 22nd e-mail with the expectation that you will respond to it in a way that is not vague, dismissive, or automated.  Moving forward, it is my hope that  in responding to citizens  in a way that is prompt, personal, and thoughtful, you will improve communication and, therefore, begin to build trust and support with the skeptics of your constituency.    

Sincerely,
Marcy Berenschot

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Have you ever been in love?

Dear Gov. Walker,

Have you ever been in love? Have you ever cared deeply about someone? I know you're married and have children, but that does not necessarily mean you've been in love. Marriage makes you look like a wholesome person--makes you a better candidate for political office--especially to republicans who love to tout about "family values"--having kids is even better for your pursuit to the top.

But I ask you if you've ever been in love because, if you have been, you would know that love makes us extend our lives beyond ourselves; we want to be with the person we love--we want to protect them, support them, touch them, share our secrets with them, let them cry on our shoulder and cry on theirs. We want to laugh with them, bike ride with them, hike with them, and, we want to grow old with them. And, part of growing old is going to the doctor more frequently and sometimes even becoming hospitalized. My dear grandparents just died within the past 2 years--my grandmother just this past April--and for the decade (maybe more) leading up to their deaths, they spent a lot of time in and out of the hospital. And when one was hospitalized, the other was right there next to their bed. This is what love is all about.  Is this what you would do for your wife? And, if so, would you do it out of love or for your image?

I'm in love with someone and have committed my life to her. We're only in our 30s so I hope not to worry so much about hospitals yet. We bought a house in Milwaukee and have started planting flowers in the yard. We walk our 3 dogs and play with our cat. We like to play the game Quiddler--have you played that? It's sort of like scrabble, but you use cards instead of a scrabble board. We watch movies and check our facebook accounts. We spend nearly all of our free time together. We love each other. And we do no harm to anyone. And now, on top of everything you're already doing to my family (I am a Milwaukee Public School Teacher facing a potential lay off because of your budget bill, and then I would not be able to afford my mortgage; not to mention the fact that you're stripping me of my right to collectively bargain), you want to strip me of my right to love my partner--to extend my life beyond my own--simply because SHE is a SHE and I am a SHE.  If my partner is hospitalized, YOU, Scott,  have decided that I do not have the right to be by her side--even though that is love. If she becomes seriously ill, YOU, Scott, have decided that I do not have the right to family medical leave--even though that is love.  If she is on her deathbed, YOU, Scott, have decided that I do not have right to decide what is best for her--the one I love--the one I have spent my life with, planting flowers with, walking dogs with, camping with, watching movies with. You surely must have never been in love before.

Someone who has been in love would only want other people to be in love too--and someone who has been in love would never restrict someone else from being with their lover in their greatest times of need.

I ask that you continue to defend the state's domestic partnership registry. Please.

And lastly, I hope that, for the sake of Wisconsin, you will fall in love someday.

Amy

recall signature fraud

Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22, recall signature fraud, and so much more. I am not sure if you have been following the recalls or not. I have just seen bits and pieces here and there; I wanted to compare notes with you. Recall signature fraud. Really? Really? Come on! This is just becoming more amazing every time I turn around, turn on the television, pick up the newspaper, listen to the radio, log into Facebook, and pretty much anything else I do on a daily basis. From what I understand, recall paperwork was submitted for 3 democratic legislators. It was discovered that signatures were obtained under false pretenses and many people removed their names from the recall sheets. I have found myself asking this question a lot: "Who do these people think they are?" I never seem to be able to come up with an answer, so I am going to pose the question to you: "Who do these people (you included) think they (you) are?" EVERYONE has laws to abide by, not to mention morals and social expectations. Moving on, of the 3 democrats, ZERO have a sufficient number of recall signatures. Recall paperwork has been submitted for 6 republican legislators. Of the 6, three people have a sufficient number of verified recall signatures. As far as I know, the other three are still having the signatures checked, so that number could grow to be as high as six out of six! Is this what you have seen and read about? These are amazing times! Please see my signature line; I encourage you to read it, think about it, and apply it to your life. I OPPOSE senate bill 22, recall signature fraud, and so much more.

Carrie

Monday, May 16, 2011

Stop by The Public House in Riverwest, Gov.

Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. I know, I know, you are disappointed that I did not email you last night. I completely understand. I had a date with my husband last night and we did not get back until after midnight. We went on a walking tour of the Riverwest neighborhood in Milwaukee. It was a tavern crawl, actually. We had the opportunity to visit some historic establishments, learn interesting information, and talk with people from the neighborhood. We had a blast! It turns out that the people we talked with in the Riverwest neighborhood support workers more than they support you. One woman shared her stories about trips to the Capitol and how great it was to see so many people uniting. We stopped at The Public House. The Public House is the second cooperative bar in the country. It has hosted some fund-raising events to raise money for the recall efforts, also. There is a huge poster in the window with your name on it, too. I don't want to spoil the surprise, so I won't tell you what it says. I recommend that you stop by, if you get a chance. It was at The Public House that David (my husband) turned to me and said, "If Paul Ryan takes away all the Medicare, there is no one else I'd rather die with than you." Romantic, huh? So, it was a really great date night; we got to talk with residents of the Riverwest neighborhood, see and learn about historic sights, and plan for when we are older. Again, I apologize for not emailing you yesterday. I hope you weren't sitting in front of your computer all night repeatedly clicking on the "get mail" button. I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.
 
Carri

Saturday, May 14, 2011

How is Wisconsin going to be open for business when the city streets are going to be closed?

Dear Scott Walker, I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. This evening, I'd like to discuss the reduction in funding for city streets, while there is an increase in funding for county roads and interstates. I have heard that your reasoning for the changes is because of the harsh winters and the amount of snow. You do know that snow falls on city streets, also, right? You do know that the ground freezes and shifts under city streets, also, right? You do know that city streets get potholes, also, right? Since we are motorcycle riders, we both know how dangerous potholes can be. Help me understand the thinking behind reducing the funding in the cities. Was this part of your "Wisconsin is open for business" plan? Business people do drive on county roads and interstates, but did you ever stop to think how they get to those county roads and interstates? I am fairly certain that a majority, if not all, business people take at least one city street daily. Then when you take into consideration how many non-business people use city streets on a daily basis, I think the numbers might astound you. Now I know that you don't feel the non-business citizens are as important. Wait, let me back up and rephrase because that is quite presumptuous of me, especially since we have never formally communicated with each other. I do not count your automatically generated form replies as communication. Your actions against non-business people makes it seem as if you do not value them as much as business people. Do you think that sounds PC enough? PC stands for "politically correct"; I know that seems like an oxymoron based on the behavior of some governmental officials lately. An oxymoron is a figure of speech that combines contradictory terms. It is not an unintelligent person who uses a particular brand of laundry detergent. Get it Oxy(clean) and moron :) That diversion was fun, now back to the issue. How is Wisconsin going to be open for business when the city streets are going to be closed? Wisconsin's city streets will literally be broke. I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.


Carrie

Friday, May 13, 2011

Democracy Demands Fairness

Governor Walker:

I doubt you’ll ever see this. I doubt I’ll ever hear back from you. But I believe in communication, and hope you do, too.

We the people of Wisconsin need you to explain why collective bargaining rights need to be curtailed. So far, you have repeatedly said the state is ‘flat broke’ and insisted that the affected union workers are all just trying to keep their cushy benefits intact. Or you’ve vaguely stated these bargaining rights simply need to go. But where is the explanation why? If it’s a truly necessary measure, and truly the right thing to do, you should explain it clearly and trust the public to be able to understand your reasons. Not doing so has created doubt and mistrust in the minds of your opponents, and led them to conclude that this is a blatant, crippling political attack on them. Unions have agreed to pay more for their benefits as required by this bill, and are more willing to make meaningful concessions than they’ve EVER been in the past. This could have been a great moment for people to work together to solve a problem. Instead it has been a power play, disguised as fiscal responsibility, hasn’t it?

Collective bargaining’s purpose is to make the negotiating parties essentially equal. It's messy, and neither side ever 'wins' completely. There is compromise, and fairness. But that practice is effectively being destroyed with this bill, without respectful interaction and little explanation from you. And what is most discriminatory about the bill itself is that collective bargaining for public safety workers’ unions (police, firefighters, and state patrol) will continue unaffected. If collective bargaining is such a problem, why make that distinction? Negotiating working conditions or benefits as a group is not related in any way to the nature of public safety jobs above all others. Would taking away those workers’ bargaining rights could cause public safety to be compromised? Yes, if they chose to walk out because of it. I know you’ve said you exempted them for that very reason. But that thinking doesn’t justify the exception. That’s not 'equality under the law,’ is it? It's evidence to the contrary.

Your approach from the beginning—hurrying the bill through and not allowing the people affected negatively by it to have any say in the matter—is the cause of all this conflict. You say you advocate for transparency, responsibility and accountability. You currently have the legislative authority to do just about anything you want. But democracy demands fairness. Your refusal to negotiate in good faith has bitterly divided the state and furthered the enmity between its citizens. Is completely disenfranchising a large portion of the population a sign of your good leadership? Is being inconsiderate a sign of your integrity? Do the ends justify the means, and that is all that matters?

We are all Wisconsinites. We demand more respectful behavior, cooperation and real answers from all our elected officials. I’m pretty sure those AWOL democratic senators would never have left if they got that from you in the first place. Please drop the collective bargaining restrictions from your current budget bill, and stop making threats about the consequences. We can face them, and overcome them, if we work together.

Brad Burrill
Weston, WI

Disillusioned and Disheartened by Democracy (two emails)


Dear Governor Walker,

If you have been listening-- which, as an elected official, it is your duty-- you have not only heard the countless criticisms of your “Budget Repair Bill,” but also the proposed solutions and concessions that workers and allies have made and are willing to make in order to knit our state back together in a way that simultaneously balances the budget and respects the professions and rights of tens of thousands of hard-working, deserving public servants.

If you have been listening, I presume you have taken the time to devise a logical, reasonable explanation for the  measures you intend to take to reduce the state deficit--that in the course of your consideration, drastically reducing the labor rights of Wisconsin workers, your constituents, your colleagues, your neighbors, your allies in keeping Wisconsin the great state it is, is an absolute last resort.  If this is, indeed, the case, please share it with the masses of distraught people who have become disillusioned and disheartened by democracy, the basis and core value for which our state and nation was built—I am one of them. 

If it is a fact that you have been listening, which I presume you have, then I have nothing new to say that will make you change your mind,  because I have a difficult time putting into words the frustration, sadness, and disturbance I am feeling in the wake of your obstinate stance in negotiating more reasonable terms with our state's public workers. 

I am not a public sector employee.  I am not a union member.  I am not a Republican.  I am not a Democrat.  I am, however, an educator; I am the daughter of two public employees who, for decades, have proudly, dutifully, and whole-heartedly served the greater good of society in the Department of Workforce Development and Wisconsin Public Schools.  I am an exemplary product of public institutions which have shaped me into the critical, compassionate, purposeful member of society I am today—just ask my teachers.  I am the classmate and friend of countless fellow educators next to whom I was taught and who continually teach me.  I am a proud Wisconsinite; I am a voter; I am a tax-payer; I am an American who wholeheartedly believes that a democratic government should grant equal opportunity to its people, even if it can’t ensure an equal outcome of results.  I stand in solidarity with these people to uphold our state and nation’s values.

In good faith and democratic process, the majority of your constituents have elected you to represent and act upon their opinions.  At the very least, all voters, not just the majority, should rightfully expect elected leaders to be mindful of our best interests when making decisions.  To silence the voices of tens of thousands of constituents by nature of scrupulosity and an unwillingness to collaborate with us to problem-solve and find common ground does not uphold this basis for democracy, or for that matter, any form of diplomacy.  Please don’t let us down.
 
Sincerely,
Marcy Berenschot
Wauwatosa, WI


Number two. . .
Our governor's criticism that our democratic senators need to "come back to work" upsets me beyond measure. Hearing, representing, and acting upon the opinions of tens of thousands of people is, above all, exactly what we, their constituents, have elected them to do. Drastic means call for drastic measures.  They are what is keeping our government hanging on this thin, wavering thread of democracy as it risks the threat of fraying into oligarchy.  My education and experiences have had me disillusioned by politics, the government, and the meaning of this word for some time now; the fact that I can overtly see glimmers of it in actions such as these restores my faith, albeit just a little, in the type of government we proudly, though too often falsely, proclaim to be. 

 As for the protesting teachers and other union members, we are acting upon a democratic freedom of which every citizen is entitled in this country.  Regardless of profession, beliefs, or party lines, simmering in outraged compliance does not fulfill this freedom, nor is it healthy for people on an individual or state level.  It's a fact in this country that the loudest mouths get the most airplay; as a teacher myself, I have experienced this truth firsthand.  However, it saddens and disturbs me that tens of thousands of people must shout, chant, bang drums, leave their jobs, write letters, make phone calls, and even travel from out of state in order to be heard.  It is truly a reflection of our leader's obstinance and pertinacity, but also of the people's fortitude and conviction.  Some argue we are shouting at the expense of students. This, then, is a contiguous and difficult lesson-- as life's greatest, most impacting lessons tend to be-- in the adage we have come to lovingly adopt and boast since the inception of our nation and into which our roots sink deeply: "freedom is not free".

Is that okay? If you send me an automated response, I am going to take that as a "yes".

Dear Scott Walker,
I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more. I attended the annual meeting for my neighborhood association. I live in Washington Heights. Actually, you did not live very far from me when you were in Wauwatosa. You probably already know that it is pretty much the best place to live in Southeastern Wisconsin, probably the whole state, maybe the country, and quite possibly the world. :) Let's just say I am extremely fond of my neighborhood. Mayor Barrett lives in my neighborhood and had the opportunity to stop in and speak at the meeting tonight. He brought up some really good points. I am going to list them and we will see if we can address them all tonight. If not, I may need to email you again in the future. Is that okay? If you send me an automated response, I am going to take that as a "yes". Here is the list:
1. You are removing the funding for the recycling programs, while keeping the law in place.
2. You decreased funding for city roads by 15%, while increasing county and interstate funding.
3. You talk about the need for shared sacrifice, while exempting public safety workers.
4. You lift residency requirements for public safety workers, while maintaining the requirement for other public workers.

I am going to start at the bottom and work my way up because I like to mix it up like that. First of all, the lifting of city residency is directly targeted at the city of Milwaukee. How can I saw that? It is the only city with residency requirements. These requirements have been in place since 1938; people accept jobs with the city knowing full well that they will move to the city. If people do not want to live in the city, there are plenty of other places to work. It is like to people who complain about union dues; find a job without a union then. I get sidetracked. Mayor Barrett reflected on the city residency requirement and whether or not it was truly detrimental to the city and residents. He said that Milwaukee Police Department attracted 3,500 applicants and the Milwaukee Fire Department Barrett did acknowledge that we saw a surge in firefighters voluntarily leaving the city last year...two (2). You read that correctly, there was a surge of 2 firefighters choosing to leave. Mayor Barrett did not clarify if both of the firefighters left because of the residency requirement or not, though, so let's not jump to conclusions and start citing this data. The last thing we would want to do is run to the press shouting about how lifting the residency requirement will allow the city to retain more of its workforce. So after Mayor Barrett announced the surge of two, many people laughed. He declared that he was serious and this was higher than average. In 11 years, 18 Milwaukee Firefighters voluntarily left the MFD. My question to you is: Why lift a residency requirement that has nothing to do with you? What are the benefits to the community? What are the benefits to safety? Weren't you just the one who was telling people to basically mind their own business? I think you should mind your own business. Who do you think you are? Why do you think you are the one to change a residency requirement that has been working for over 70 years? What do you have against Milwaukee? Do you harbor animosity from your university days? Did you want to live in Milwaukee, but had to settle for Wauwatosa? Help me out here; I am just trying to gain some insight. I am sure we can work through these feelings, so you can feel at peace. Until we do work through things, I recommend you keep your nose where it belongs, in Madison. That is if you can find time to actually be there. You have been on quite the tour lately. Who knows, you may even get some work done. I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.
Sincerely,
Carrie
"I decided to get into public service for its nobility in helping my fellow man."~~~Daniel Boehnen
P.S. I guess we will have to talk about the other points on the list tomorrow night. I OPPOSE senate bill 22 and so much more.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Pissed off...

Dear Fuckface,
 
When you get done fucking your mother, I hope you give some serious thought to how you are destroying Wisconsin.  I know you love Koch [pronounced "coke"], but the people of Wisconsin, including many of those who regret voting for you, do not. 
 
If you want to be a rich man in a poor country, move to Mexico.  I will gladly pay for your airfare.  In the meantime, go scratch your ass. 
 
Very truly yours,
 
Jann

Several Letters to Several People We Must Hold Responsible

To: govgeneral@wisconsin.gov
Subject: veto request
Date: Thu,
3 Feb 2011

Dear Gov. Walker,

You were elected to represent the people of the State of Wisconsin - not a few special interests. And to represent us fairly - not favor your contributors.

As your constituent, I ask that you uphold the law and our rights and veto SS-SB-10/SS-AB-10, the Special Favors Bill.

Government should not be for sale. No special interest should be allowed to avoid the law.

To: sen.ellis@legis.wisconsin.gov
Subject: pending Union legislation
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011

Dear Senator Ellis,

I'm not a union member. I’m not a democrat. I’m not a republican. I’m a Wisconsite and this is the first time in over 50 years when I am ashamed to say so.

I just read your comments about the pending bill to remove most collective bargaining rights from government workers and have to wonder: what part don’t you understand?

Why do you think that the deficit is the fault of government workers? And that this bill is the only way to solve it? You said that you “wished there was an alternative that didn't go as far.” Well – did you (or anyone) approach the unions and ask for concessions? Explain that the only other options were layoffs or to repeal their rights? Wasn’t this an alternative?

Or how about this: all our high paid government leaders (like the newly appointed crony head of the State Patrol - and why is this one of the groups who keep their rights?) take a pay and benefit cut? Wasn’t this an alternative?

Or how about stop giving big tax breaks to businesses? Wasn’t this an alternative?

You said: "We didn't set this menu, the governor did."

Really? You mean the governor writes the laws and passes the laws? Then why don’t you and the rest of our legislature go home – and let your salaries and benefits and the salaries and benefits of all your staff members and your office budgets be applied toward the deficit. Isn’t this an alternative?

You are supposed to represent the best interests of the people of this state – NOT special interests.

I ask you to do so - to start looking at the alternatives and to stop taking away our rights.

Subject: budget bill
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011

Dear Senator Darling,


I'm not a union member. I’m not a democrat. I’m not a republican. I’m a Wisconsite and this is the first time in over 50 years when I am ashamed to say so.

I just read about the pending bill to remove most collective bargaining rights from government workers and have to wonder: what part don’t you understand?

This is like killing a gnat with a nuclear weapon.

Why do you think that the deficit is the fault of government workers? And that this bill is the only way to solve it?

Did you (or anyone) approach the unions and ask for concessions first?

This bill is not the answer – it only makes the state look foolish and its leaders appear to be shortsighted tyrants. And public workers aren’t the only victims.

(If you really want to save money, how about all our high-paid government leaders (including the newly appointed crony head of the State Patrol) take a pay and benefit cut?

You are supposed to represent the interests of the people of this state – NOT special interests.

I ask you to do so. You have better, more reasoned options. Kill this bill and taker the time to consider them.

Subject: budget bill
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011

Dear Senator,

You claimed you have no alternatives, but what about this:

In its Jan. 31 memo to legislators on the condition of the state’s budget, the Fiscal Bureau determined that the state will end the year with a balance of $121.4 million.

To the extent that there is an imbalance -- Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit -- it is not because of a drop in revenues or increases in the cost of state employee contracts, benefits or pensions. It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January. If the Legislature were simply to rescind Walker’s new spending schemes -- or delay their implementation until they are offset by fresh revenues -- the “crisis” would not exist.

The Fiscal Bureau memo -- which readers can access at http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/Misc/2011_01_31Vos&Darling.pdf -- makes it clear that Walker did not inherit a budget that required a repair bill.

So why not have the guts to do your job right:

What's your excuse not to rescind Walker's new spending schemes?

What's your excuse not to cut pay, pensions and and benefits to the governor, all appointed positions, and all members of the legislature?

What's your excuse not to sell the governor's mansion/eliminate his leased car and make him pay for his own housing and transportation like the rest of us?

To: [All Republican Senators]
Subject: pending bill
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011

Dear Senator,

You claimed your strong arm tactics (a bill which includes dozens of provisions that have nothing to do with solving an alleged budget crisis) are necessary, but what about this:

In its Jan. 31 memo to legislators on the condition of the state’s budget, the Fiscal Bureau determined that the state will end the year with a balance of $121.4 million.

To the extent that there is an imbalance -- Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit -- it is not because of a drop in revenues or increases in the cost of state employee contracts, benefits or pensions. It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January. If the Legislature were simply to rescind Walker’s new spending schemes -- or delay their implementation until they are offset by fresh revenues -- the “crisis” would not exist.

The Fiscal Bureau memo -- which readers can access at http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/Misc/2011_01_31Vos&Darling.pdf -- makes it clear that Walker did not inherit a budget that required a repair bill.

So why not have the guts to do your job right:

What's your excuse not to rescind Walker's new spending schemes?

What's your excuse not to cut pay, pensions and benefits to the governor, all appointed positions, and all members of the legislature before penalizing the people of this state?

What's your excuse not to sell the governor's mansion/eliminate his leased car and make him pay for his own housing and transportation like the rest of us?

Subject: kill the bill
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011

I am a Wisconsin voter and I oppose your pending budget bill.

It's not the answer. Kill the bill.

Subject: kill the bill
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011

Dear Representative Rivard,

My family has lived in Chetek for more than 150 years - ever since my great-grandmother homesteaded there. I own the family cottage in Chetek that my cousin built over 100 years ago.

This is the first time I've been ashamed of my government.

Scott Walker's budget bill goes far beyond fiscal issues, and, as has been well-documented, is not the answer:



Koch Industries Slashed WI Jobs, Helped Elect Scott Walker, Now Orchestrating Pro-Walker Protest http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/18/business-teaparty-wisconsin/

Gov. Walker’s Pretext www.nytimes.com/2011/02/18/opinion/18fri1.html February 17, 2011

Interesting that he created the deficit he now insists can only be solved with his bill, a bill which goes far beyond finances in scope.

And that other reasons he offered for key legislation have proven false:

In trying to tie the lawsuit reforms to job creation, Walker asserted the issue is "one of the most important factors" when businesses are deciding to expand or invest in Wisconsin. That’s a major overreach.


Walker said that if his proposal for state employees to pay more for their benefits is not adopted, alternatives such as removing nearly 200,000 children from Medicaid would have to be considered. But that’s a phony alternative. Legally, the state does not have the option to remove kids from Medicaid; Walker acknowledged he did not check before making the statement.


We need a solution that helps us - not hurts us while advancing the interests of special interest groups.

I ask you to kill the bill.

To: rep.wynn@legis.wi.gov
Subject: pending budget bill
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011

Dear Representative Wynn,

I'm not a union member. I am a Wisconsinite - and this is the first time in over 50 years that I've been ashamed of my government.

Scott Walker's budget bill goes far beyond fiscal issues, and, as has been well-documented, should be questioned:

legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/Misc/2011_01_31Vos&Darling.pdf

host.madison.com/ct/news/opinion/editorial/article_61064e9a-27b0-5f28-b6d1-a57c8b2aaaf6.html
Koch Industries Slashed WI Jobs, Helped Elect Scott Walker, Now Orchestrating Pro-Walker Protest http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/18/business-teaparty-wisconsin/

Gov. Walker’s Pretext www.nytimes.com/2011/02/18/opinion/18fri1.html February 17, 2011
Interesting that he created the deficit he now insists can only be solved with his bill, a bill which goes far beyond finances in scope.
And that other reasons he offered for key legislation have proven false:
In trying to tie the lawsuit reforms to job creation, Walker asserted the issue is "one of the most important factors" when businesses are deciding to expand or invest in Wisconsin. That’s a major overreach.


Walker said that if his proposal for state employees to pay more for their benefits is not adopted, alternatives such as removing nearly 200,000 children from Medicaid would have to be considered. But that’s a phony alternative. Legally, the state does not have the option to remove kids from Medicaid; Walker acknowledged he did not check before making the statement.


We need a solution that helps us - not hurts us while advancing the interests of special interest groups. The unions have no problem with concessions, so that's not the issue.
Why not rescind Walker's new spending schemes?
Why not repeal the special sessions bills that reduced revenue,  a major source of the deficit problems (including Special Session Senate Bill 2, Assembly Bill 3, and Assembly Bill 7) that were mentioned in the report by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau? (see legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/Misc/2011_01_31Vos&Darling.pdf)
Why not cut pay, pensions and and benefits to the governor, all appointed positions, and all members of the legislature?

Why not sell the governor's mansion/eliminate his leased car and make him pay for his own housing and transportation like the rest of us?

I ask you to explore other options and to kill the bill.


Subject: kill the bill
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011

Dear Gov. Walker,

I read with interest your comment that an air traffic controller "supports" you.

Well, I was an air traffic controller hired after Reagan busted the union so I can say with authority that Reagan was wrong as are you. I do not support you. And no - I am not and never have been a union member. I just know wrongdoing when I see it.

You need to kill the bill.

Subject: budget repair bill
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011

Dear Gov. Walker,

Even leaders of the revolt in Egypt think you are wrong and support the people who oppose your bill:

February 20th, 2011
'We Stand With You as You Stood With Us': Statement to Workers of Wisconsin by Kamal Abbas of Egypt's Centre for Trade Unions and Workers Services
KAMAL ABBAS: I am speaking to you from a place very close to Tahrir Square in Cairo, "Liberation Square", which was the heart of the Revolution in Egypt. This is the place were many of our youth paid with their lives and blood in the struggle for our just rights.

From this place, I want you to know that we stand with you as you stood with us.

I want you to know that no power can challenge the will of the people when they believe in their rights. When they raise their voices loud and clear and struggle against exploitation.

No one believed that our revolution could succeed against the strongest dictatorship in the region. But in 18 days the revolution achieved the victory of the people. When the working class of Egypt joined the revolution on 9 and 10 February, the dictatorship was doomed and the victory of the people became inevitable.

We want you to know that we stand on your side. Stand firm and don't waiver. Don't give up on your rights. Victory always belongs to the people who stand firm and demand their just rights.

We and all the people of the world stand on your side and give you our full support.

As our just struggle for freedom, democracy and justice succeeded, your struggle will succeed. Victory belongs to you when you stand firm and remain steadfast in demanding your just rights.

We support you. we support the struggle of the peoples of Libya, Bahrain and Algeria, who are fighting for their just rights and falling martyrs in the face of the autocratic regimes. The peoples are determined to succeed no matter the sacrifices and they will be victorious.

Today is the day of the American workers. We salute you American workers! You will be victorious. Victory belongs to all the people of the world, who are fighting against exploitation, and for their just rights.


About Kamal Abbas and the Centre for Trade Unions and Workers Services:

Kamal Abbas is General Coordinator of the CTUWS, an umbrella advocacy organization for independent unions in Egypt. The CTUWS, which was awarded the 1999 French Republic's Human Rights Prize, suffered repeated harassment and attack by the Mubarak regime, and played a leading role in its overthrow. Abbas, who witnessed friends killed by the regime during the 1989 Helwan steel strike and was himself arrested and threatened numerous times, has received extensive international recognition for his union and civil society leadership.

As your constituent (unlike the "supporters" your benefactors bussed in from out of state), I ask you to kill the bill.

Subject: budget repair
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011

Dear Senator:

You've said you have no alternative to adopting the "budget repair bill."

I previously submitted several other alternatives to you but you have not responded.

Other options are also available. From Andrew Reschovsky, a professor of public affairs and applied economics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a visiting fellow at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in Cambridge, Massachusetts:

The benefit reductions in the so-called budget repair bill save only $30 million, and stripping state and local government employees of their bargaining rights will contribute nothing to closing this year's budget gap.

The state has a wide range of options available for closing this year's relatively small fiscal year 2011 budget gap. Additional revenue could be raised by eliminating any of a large number of exemptions, deductions or exclusions from the Wisconsin tax system. Fees, underused in Wisconsin, could be raised. Funds could be transferred into the general fund. Funds that have been appropriated, but not yet spent this fiscal year, could be recaptured.


Have you contacted any of these authorities for their ideas?

And are you considering any of the suggestions I previously made?


Subject: kill the bill
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011

Dear Governor,

Here is another article showing how bad your budget bill is for Wisconsin.

Please kill the bill.

Even If You Hate Unions You Should Oppose Gov. Scott Walker: Budget Puts Wisconsin at Risk of Major Economic Decline

Monday, February 21, 2011


Even if you hate unions, there are many reasons that you should oppose the radical budget plans of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker--which appears to be a test case for the national GOP agenda. Out-of-state billionaires, including the infamous Koch Brothers, are whispering in Walker's ear from the close access tens of thousands of dollars in contributions has bought them. These folks have no stake in the future of this state, and appear intent on destroying unions as a counter-balancing national political force. But what will their agenda do to quality of life in this state? What does their agenda do to the future of our economy?

1.) Wisconsin public schools rank high on many important measures, including the rate of graduating kids and preparing them for college. That has long been at the heart of our economic success.

We wrote here about Walkers' planned cutbacks to school aids. There is no doubt that these enormous cuts will lead to lay-offs and and a decline in public education in Wisconsin. The cuts are too big to be absorbed by even the drastic decline in teacher benefits contemplated in Walker's bill. Further, poor school districts will take by far the biggest hits--leading to the wider gaps between thr rich and poor that seem to be the driving force and goal of all Republican economic policies.

From the MSJO article: Butler pointed out that teachers in the Sparta School District pay 20% of their health premiums, limiting the district's ability to achieve savings through health insurance benefit reductions. In addition, the effect of the budget will be felt differently based on how much a school district's budget relies on aid from the state, an equation affected by property wealth. In that respect, MPS has more to lose than a district such as Fox Point. In 2008-'09, $7,237 of MPS' per pupil revenue of $14,211 came from the state. In Fox Point, per pupil revenue of $14,240 included just $747 from the state.

2.) Wisconsin currently ranks very high in the percentage of state residents who have health insurance, with 91.5% of residents having Health Insurance coverage. This contributes to keeping health insurance costs down for all. Oh, and it just happens to save some lives, as we wrote here.

"BadgerCare is Wisconsin’s award-winning Medicaid program that provides health care coverage for more than 750,000 men and women—and their children—from across the state. Established in 1997 as a bipartisan effort to encourage work and improve health care in Wisconsin, BadgerCare has proven to be a highly effective—and cost-effective—program, successful in both rural and urban communities, in good economies and bad."

At Saturday's Madison protest, we spoke to this young man who was protesting Walker's proposed cuts and sweeping power grab in the operation of Badger Care. Five years ago, he was given a 30 percent chance of living five years from a diagnosis of bone cancer--if he could afford promising treatments. The Badger Care program stepped up to get him the state-of-the art treatment, and he is now doing very well.

Walker's bill will likely gut both Badger Care and Medicaid programs in Wisconsin.

3.) Unlike other states, Wisconsin's state pension system, which includes many local workers as well, is fully funded and contributes billions of dollars to the state economy. Will local municipalities continue to fully pension obligations as they face Gov. Walkers' massive reduction of local aid?

Wisconsin's state pension fund was recently ranked at the Top of the pension class by both a Minneapolis Federal Reserve publication and two national studies. As Pew Center Report writes: In 2000, just over half the states had fully funded pension systems. By 2006, that number had shrunk to six states. By 2008, only four—Florida, New York, Washington and Wisconsin—could make that claim.

Subject: kill the bill
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011



My husband and I Wisconsin taxpayers and we oppose your pending budget bill.

It's not the answer. Kill the bill.

Subject: constituent comments
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011

Dear Mr. Wynn,

I emailed you before but you did not have the courtesy to respond.

I am a constituent and I am opposed to the budget repair bill and the proposed new budget.

These bills are a poison that will destroy our state.

There are better ways. Fix the budget by taxing the rich!

I also want you to know that the bullying of the 14 (and their staff)  by your colleagues is despicable - as is closing the capitol to the public. You should be ashamed.

Such tactics can never be acceptable in a free society. I ask you to do whatever is possible to make sure they reverse their actions - actions which only reflect negatively on anyone associated with them

Please know that everyone I know shares my feelings. I haven't met a single person who supports Walker or his bills.

Subject: citizen concerns
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011

Dear Rep. Rivard,

I emailed you before but you did not have the courtesy to respond.

My family has lived in Chetek since my great-grandmother homesteaded there in the 1850's. My mother is buried there along with all those who passed before her. Many of my family still live in your district. I own the family cottage on Lake Chetek, a cottage which a cousin built more than 100 years ago.

I am writing to tell you that I am opposed to the budget repair bill and the proposed new budget.

These bills are a poison that will destroy our state.

There are better ways. Stop giving tax breaks to the wealthy. Fix the budget by taxing the rich:

"As a study by the Institute for Wisconsin's Future documented, Wisconsin corporations underpay state and local taxes by more than $1.3 billion annually: This is the difference between what businesses actually pay in state and local taxes and what they would be contributing if paying at the average national rate." http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/116955013.html

I want to know why you aren't pursuing this option instead of destroying the framework of our state.

I also want you to know that the bullying of the 14 (and their staff) by your colleagues is despicable - as is closing the capitol to the public. You should be ashamed.

Such tactics can never be acceptable in a free society. I ask you to do whatever is possible to make sure they reverse their actions - actions which only reflect negatively on anyone associated with them

Please know that everyone I know shares my feelings. I haven't met a single person who supports Walker or his bills.

I look forward to your response.

Subject: citizen comment
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011

Dear Sen. Luther:

I am writing to tell you that I am opposed to the budget repair bill and the proposed new budget. I am not a union member and I am not a democrat.

These bills are a poison that will destroy our state.

There are better ways. Stop giving tax breaks to the wealthy. Fix the budget by taxing the rich:

"As a study by the Institute for Wisconsin's Future documented, Wisconsin corporations underpay state and local taxes by more than $1.3 billion annually: This is the difference between what businesses actually pay in state and local taxes and what they would be contributing if paying at the average national rate." http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/116955013.html

I want to know why you aren't pursuing this option instead of destroying the framework of our state. Even the Wall Street Journal agrees the situation is not as dire as you pretend:

Even Without Muni Bond Sale, Wisconsin Not in Fiscal Peril - WSJ.com

I also want you to know that the bullying of the 14 (and their staff) by you and/or your colleagues is despicable - as is closing the capitol to the public. You should be ashamed.

Such tactics can never be acceptable in a free society. I ask you to do whatever is possible to make sure these actions are reversed.

Please know that everyone I know shares my feelings. I haven't met a single person who supports Walker or his bills.

I look forward to your response.

PS additional information about how to end a budget problem:

US Uncut calls for an end to corporate tax avoidance instead of cuts to valuable public services. Anger is rising as Americans are being forced to endure brutal budget cuts at both the federal and state-level. Recent events in Wisconsin have inspired hard-working Americans to make their voices heard, and this populist message is spreading like wildfire across the country.

"If Bank of America alone paid their taxes, we could 'uncut' $1.7 billion in early childhood education," said Ryan Clayton, a DC-based media analyst, "Big corporations dodge up to $100 billion every year, and if they paid their taxes this year like the rest of us do, we could stop the $100 billion in cuts to college loans too."


Subject: public input
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011

Dear Mike,

I am a Wisconsin resident who is not a union member and not a democrat.

Your conduct is reprehensible and shows that you do not deserve to be an employee of the State of Wisconsin. You should not get another penny of our tax dollars. How dare you close the state capitol to the public - and close it you have no matter what you say to the contrary. When doors are locked and  law enforcement officers guard each entrance to keep out the public and permit only limited entrance then the building is closed.

You are an embarrassment to the people of this great state. How do you live with yourself? Especially when you are wasting our tax dollars on those officers?

You should be ashamed - and you should resign for engaging in such unethical conduct.

Subject: constituent concerns
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011

Dear Mr. Wynn,

I emailed you before but you did not have the courtesy to respond.

I am a constituent and I am opposed to the budget repair bill and the proposed new budget.

These bills are a poison that will destroy our state.

I want to know why you don't fix the budget by taxing the rich instead. It's easy and simple to do and doesn't require hurting anyone.

I also want you to know that the bullying of the 14 (and their staff)  by your colleagues is despicable - as is closing the capitol to the public. You should be ashamed.

Such tactics can never be acceptable in a free society. I ask you to do whatever is possible to make sure they reverse their actions - actions which only reflect negatively on anyone associated with them

Please know that everyone I know shares my feelings. I haven't met a single person who supports Walker or his bills.

When are you going to stop trampling the rights of the people and start representing them instead as you were elected to do?

Subject: constituent request
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011

Dear Scott,

I noticed on your facebook page that you post editorials and stories relating to your Budget repair bill and proposed budget.

Since you represent all of us, I ask that you post editorials and stories telling both sides of the story, including the one below.

I you won't do so please let me know why not.

Editorial: State governments should support teachers (from the Oregon Daily Emerald)

Like many states in the union, Wisconsin is facing budget issues as a result of the economic recession. To mitigate the budget crisis within his state, Gov. Scott Walker is attempting to pass a budget bill that would effectively remove the collective-bargaining rights of public employees. It should be noted that before the bill's proposal, Wisconsin teachers agreed to take pay cuts in light of the state's poor economy as long as they were able to negotiate the cuts as a group.

Public school teachers play a crucial role in American society. Performing noble work for mediocre compensation, they help shape the future. Despite curriculum requirements and a lack of public resources, they still manage to empower and enrich the minds of students. They educate those who cannot afford a private education, and they pave the road for students toward new opportunities to better themselves and their communities. Some of teachers work in dangerous inner-city neighborhoods, and others deal with special needs students who require a large amount of time and effort. They preserve democracy and prevent our country from becoming a plutocracy. To deny their importance would be unpatriotic in every sense of the word.

Apparently Walker does not agree.

Walker has a stark agenda influenced by private donor David Koch, whose advertising campaign centers around the current highest salary of a Wisconsin school teacher — more than $80,000 — and the economic impacts on the state. The campaign puts a connotation of "sinful" on teachers' nine-month work year, and it depicts their lifestyle as one of luxury on the tax-payer's dime. In addition to the campaign, Wisconsin's capital has been accused of blocking a pro-union website. What's more, members of union movement American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations continue to be labeled as "cop-haters" by conservative pundits.

Though the bill would cut teachers' salaries and their right to negotiate, it would simultaneously allot new funds for transportation services that are outsourced to private companies. Since the bill's proposal, 14 Democratic senators have left the state in an effort to protest and keep the bill from being passed in the state legislature.

Walker said he would not talk to anyone from the press, but the editor of the online Buffalo Beast made a prank this week that led to new developments in the story.

Pretending to be David Koch and making up a phony story about losing his phone, the editor was granted access to Walker. During the conversation, Walker said he was threatening the 14 senators with direct deposit halts, arrest warrants and worker layoffs. He referred to the one approachable democrat as "not one of us," and openly responded to one of the editor's statements with, "You're not talking to any of these democrat bastards, are you?"

Since the online fiasco, more and more protests have emerged throughout the state of Wisconsin. The Wisconsin police are standing in solidarity with the workers, refusing to obey Walker's order to guard the Capitol building. As a state, they are demonstrating the importance of unions and collective bargaining rights.

If the protestors' demands are ignored and the 14 missing senators are blackmailed into returning to the state, the bill will likely pass within the Wisconsin Senate, given the Republican majority. This could cause a domino effect of similar legislation throughout the country.

Public schools have faced continuous budget cuts since the turn of the millennium — from elementary schools to universities. If Walker's bill is passed, it will not only hurt Wisconsin teachers, but it will also discourage working for public schools nationwide. While places like India are investing in education, Wisconsin is demonstrating that America has other priorities. For the well-being of the public sector, all measures should be taken to prevent Walker's bill from being passed.


Subject: your illegal actions
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011

Dear Sen. Fitzgerald,

I am writing to ask you to explain why you think you can unilaterally disenfranchise almost half the voters in this state, myself included. Tim Cullen is my senator and I am glad he allowed me and the rest of the public the opportunity we deserved to learn the facts about the bill. You were shameful in your actions to try to keep the public in the dark.

I ask you to explain the legal basis for your actions in declaring the 14 in contempt and refusing to count their votes.

I've read the constitution and applicable laws and neither seems to gives you the authority to do what you've been doing.

First, none of the 14 has done anything that qualifies as contempt. Second, you can't just wave your gavel and pronounce them in contempt. Even if they had done anything that might be considered contempt, the constitution first requires notice and an opportunity to be heard, which involves a public hearing process. A pronouncement in absentia does not pass muster.

Third, I found no legal authority allowing you to impose the sanctions you have imposed.

Shame on you.

I have a right granted by law to have my senator represent me and vote on my behalf. You, however, have no right to do what you are doing and I hope that your illegal actions will  result in your removal from public office.

In the meantime, explain the legal authority for your actions.

Subject: taxpayer question
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011

I would like to know:

1. How much does Governor Scott Walker contribute to his pension every month?

2. What benefits (pension and any other) will he receive after he ceases being the governor?

3. How much does Governor Scott Walker contribute to his health insurance every month?

4. How do I obtain information about the pension benefits he receives or will receive from his position as Milwaukee County Executive and his years in the state assembly?

5. How do I obtain information about all the benefits he receives as the governor?

6. What is the governor's annual salary?

Thank you.

Subject: constituent concerns
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011

Dear Scott,

I have written you several times but you haven't had the courtesy to respond.

I want to know:

Why do you take credit for new jobs that you did nothing to create? When will you give credit to the correct people?

Why are you eliminating the Dept. Of Commerce which was a huge part of the recent job successes for which you are taking the credit. I oppose eliminating the department and ask that you reverse that decision.

Why are you spending our tax dollars to travel around the state avoiding your constituents? How much has your travel cost us since January 1st?

Since Wisconsin is broke, why are you giving tax breaks to big businesses and the rich?

Since Wisconsin is broke, why don't you sell the mansion and the state paid car and pay for your own house and car like the rest of us?

Since Wisconsin is broke, why don't you slash your pay and benefits (including pension), and the pay and benefits (including pension) of legislators and all appointed positions?

Since Wisconsin is broke - why did it hire Randy Hopper's girlfriend? And why did it give her a 35% increase in pay over her predecessor?

I look forward to your detailed response.

Subject: question
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011

Dear Scott,
Last month your cabinet member added Randy Hopper's girlfriend, Valerie Cass, to the state payroll. Ms. Cass is being paid $12,000 more than the person she replaced. Is this why you say other public workers need to contribute more of their pay?

And if Wisconsin is broker, how could it afford to hire her? And also to give her a 35% raise?

I look forward to your response.

Subject: question
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011

Dear Scott,

Last month your cabinet member added Randy Hopper's girlfriend, Valerie Cass, to the state payroll. Ms. Cass is being paid $12,000 more than the person she replaced. Is this why you say other public workers need to contribute more of their pay?

And if Wisconsin is broke, how could it afford to hire her? And also to give her a 35% raise?

I look forward to your response.


Subject: wasted
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011

Dear Scott:

Your promises to stop spending should begin with you:  STOP SPENDING OUR TAX DOLLARS ON TRAVEL. You are wasting our tax dollars on trips to hold press conferences and to drum up support for your ill-fated budget bills.

Stop it! That money is better spent on essential services. You should be ashamed.

And when are you going to sell the state-paid car and pay for your own transportation?